On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:11:40PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 4/24/13 11:37 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:25:51PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote: > > Would it make sense to shift development of Qtshark to Qt5? I don't see > > much merrit in supporting both Qt4 and Qt5 and at least on my openSUSE > > system, I need to reinstall the development packages because they can't > > coexist, making build stuff for Qt5 extremly inconvenient. Oh, and regarding > > long time maintainance I'd rather have Qt5 support than Qt4 support. > > It might. Qt5 wasn't usable until recently, so most of the development > so far has been with Qt4. Are the APIs really that different, however? > So far supporting both hasn't been nearly as much trouble as supporting > GTK2 and GTK3.
It's not so much the coding (with some features only available in the newer version), it's the testing ;) > Can you try adding the following to your GTK settings (which might be > named ~/.gtkrc-2.0 or ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini)? > > gtk-scrolled-window-placement = top-right > > On my laptop this moves the vertical scrollbars to the left. It seems > really odd to have a setting for this in a single application instead of > system-wide. Wow, I wasn't aware of that. Wireshark is the only gtk-application I run regularly (probably the only one I started this month), but it is still very nice to know. Now I can comfortably use Wireshark again. Many thanks! Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe