Ok. But then the question comes up, if a UI interface should be part of Wireshark or part of wsgd. As a last resort wsgd could be ported to wireshark, but this is a shoe I would only put on me as a last step.
Also, should I implement the new UI only for the new (Qt) interface, or for the GTK interface as well? I would prefer the first step, as I do have good knowledge of the framework, but very little about GTK. kind regards, Roland On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote: > On 15 October 2013 17:25, Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> >> I actually did not know about wsgd.free.fr. For what I want to >> achieve, this would be completely sufficient. But It would need a UI, >> because the definition of the wsgd and fdesc files would be too much >> for the nomal user. >> >> I will work on that instead, and see where I can go from there. >> >> Just one question though, why is this plugin not part of wireshark? >> >> > > I think the main reason is that it's C++. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
