On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. But then the question comes up, if a UI interface should be part > of Wireshark or part of wsgd. As a last resort wsgd could be ported to > wireshark, but this is a shoe I would only put on me as a last step. wsgd is currently a plugin dissector for Wireshark, so I'm not sure what "ported to Wireshark" would mean. I think it should, in some form, be incorporated into Wireshark, so as to, at minimum, allow people to add support for new protocols to Wireshark without having to write C or C++ code and run a compiler to build a plugin or a new version of Wireshark with a new builtin dissector. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
