Hi That was indeed the version I used. The issue is, although the exe's say 64bit on the outside, they actually install a 64bit QtCreator, but a 32bit library version. What I need would be the 64bit version. The reason seems to be, to force the open-source version of Qt to always use the latest version of Qt. Which I can understand, but in this case it really annoys me quite a bit.
I guess, I have no other choice to compile the while thing again. regards, Roland On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote: > I did do a quick check when Roland asked, and got there from > https://www.qt.io/download-open-source/ -> Qt 5.3 and all older versions > of Qt are available in the archive -> http://download.qt.io/archive/qt/ > and so on, but wondered if that was the version that he said actually > downloaded a 32 bit copy. > > > On 3 June 2015 at 16:39, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote: > >> It looks like direct downloads are available at >> >> https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/ >> >> I got there by copying one of the online installer links listed at >> https://www.qt.io/download-open-source/ and trimming off the file and >> version. >> >> On 6/3/15 7:32 AM, Roland Knall wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > Is it possible to download the Qt version, with which the buildbot >> builds >> > the windows version of Wireshark? Our company has switched to 5.4 and >> the >> > plugin I am building uses a Qt class, which introduced flags only >> available >> > with 5.4. If I load my plugin in wireshark, wireshark claims the missing >> > flags and functions (as it runs with Qt 5.3.1 and of course has never >> seen >> > those methods). >> > >> > So I would be able to build with 5.3.1, but the issue being, that Digia >> > does not allow the 64bit version of older releases to be downloaded (if >> you >> > do, you end up with the 32bit, although the download clearly states >> 64bit). >> > >> > So, long story short, does anyone have a 5.3.1 version with real 64bit >> > lying around or can I download the buildbot version somewhere? anonsvn >> did >> > not contain a version for msvc2013. >> > >> > regards, >> > Roland >> > >> > p.s.: I know I can build from scratch. so far I am avoiding that, but it >> > might be my only option left. >> > >> > >> > >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >> ?subject=unsubscribe >> > >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >> ?subject=unsubscribe >> > > > > -- > Graham Bloice > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
