That's exactly the thing. The Onlineinstaller for 5.3.1 is not working
('cause they turned of the URLs), and the 64bit installer only installed
the msvc2013 directory.On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote: > What does running "find /cygdrive/c/Qt -iname qt5core.dll -exec file {} +" > under Cygwin show on your system? I get the following: > > /cygdrive/c/Qt/5.3/msvc2013_64_opengl/bin/Qt5Core.dll: PE32+ executable > (DLL) (GUI) x86-64, for MS Windows > /cygdrive/c/Qt/5.3/msvc2013_opengl/bin/Qt5Core.dll: PE32 executable > (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows > /cygdrive/c/Qt/Tools/QtCreator/bin/Qt5Core.dll: PE32 executable > (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows > > I originally installed the Qt 5.3 MSVC 2013 32-bit and 64-bit OpenGL > packages using the online installer and recently upgraded using the > maintenance tool. > > On 6/3/15 10:38 AM, Roland Knall wrote: > > Hi > > > > That was indeed the version I used. The issue is, although the exe's say > > 64bit on the outside, they actually install a 64bit QtCreator, but a > 32bit > > library version. What I need would be the 64bit version. The reason seems > > to be, to force the open-source version of Qt to always use the latest > > version of Qt. Which I can understand, but in this case it really annoys > me > > quite a bit. > > > > I guess, I have no other choice to compile the while thing again. > > > > regards, > > Roland > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Graham Bloice < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I did do a quick check when Roland asked, and got there > > from https://www.qt.io/download-open-source/ -> Qt 5.3 and all older > > versions of Qt are available in the archive > > -> http://download.qt.io/archive/qt/ and so on, but wondered if that > > was the version that he said actually downloaded a 32 bit copy. > > > > > > On 3 June 2015 at 16:39, Gerald Combs <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > It looks like direct downloads are available at > > > > https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/ > > > > I got there by copying one of the online installer links listed > at > > https://www.qt.io/download-open-source/ and trimming off the > file > > and version. > > > > On 6/3/15 7:32 AM, Roland Knall wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Is it possible to download the Qt version, with which the > > buildbot builds > > > the windows version of Wireshark? Our company has switched to > 5.4 > > and the > > > plugin I am building uses a Qt class, which introduced flags > only > > available > > > with 5.4. If I load my plugin in wireshark, wireshark claims > the > > missing > > > flags and functions (as it runs with Qt 5.3.1 and of course has > > never seen > > > those methods). > > > > > > So I would be able to build with 5.3.1, but the issue being, > that > > Digia > > > does not allow the 64bit version of older releases to be > > downloaded (if you > > > do, you end up with the 32bit, although the download clearly > > states 64bit). > > > > > > So, long story short, does anyone have a 5.3.1 version with > real > > 64bit > > > lying around or can I download the buildbot version somewhere? > > anonsvn did > > > not contain a version for msvc2013. > > > > > > regards, > > > Roland > > > > > > p.s.: I know I can build from scratch. so far I am avoiding > that, > > but it > > > might be my only option left. > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >> > > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > > Unsubscribe: > https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > > mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Graham Bloice > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
