Hi Joerg,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I plan to do some cleanups to
> - somewhat improve the readability of the code
>   1) Get rid of reduntant author entries and code comments, see
>      https://code.wireshark.org/review/16154

Mixed opinion about this change... (but to last already merged)
But i think we can remove all authors info (or add online by author like
already on the top
 Credits:
 *
<= Add list of contributor (from shortlog ?)


>   2) Get rid of those fixed field functions that only add one of two items.
>      Call the remaining functions directly (without the indirection of
>      add_fixed_field()).
>
if i remember, it is add because more easy to "maintain" this code...


> - make the use of filters more straight forward: We currently register the
>   following top level filters within the file:
>   wlan_aggregate
>   wlan
>   wlan_mgt
>   wlan_rsna_eapol
>   I'd like to merge at least wlan_mgt into wlan. I don't see the gain in
> the
>   separation and it definitely confuses me:
>   a) wlan_mgt is not only managemnt frames but also control frames while
>      data frames are just wlan.
>   b) The addresses inside wlan_mgt frames are addressed via wlan.xxx
>
Good idea but..
it will break all filter... (and wireless is often use...)

Can be wait after 2.2.0 ? (planned to this summer)

Cheers


>
> Let me know what you think about these things.
>
> Thanks
>    Jörg
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jma...@loplof.de>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to