I'd second the shorter lifespan of 3.0. It also emphasizes the point, that this is a major change release, and it should mature over time.
Roland On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Den 15 feb. 2018 6:41 em skrev "Gerald Combs" <ger...@wireshark.org>: > > On 2/14/18 11:08 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > > > 2.6 is TLS release ? i think it will be nice to kept support of 32bits > and > > drop for 3.0 > > I think it makes sense to extend the release lifetime of 2.6 to 30 months. > At the same time I'd like to avoid having more than three active stable > releases at any given time. We'd either have to shorten the lifetime of 3.0 > to 18 or 20 months or delay the release of 3.2 or 3.4 to fall 2019 and fall > 2020 respectively, or both. > > > As we plan major changes in 3.0 perhaps it makes sense with a shorter > lifespan? > Regards > Anders > > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscr > ibe > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject= > unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
