Found the presentation, this is fantastic.

Thanks!

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:58 PM Anders Broman via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In the frame layer there is the “Encapsulation type” the way the pcap
> format works this indicates how the data following should be interpreted.
>
> Linktype/encapsulation type is defined at
> https://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html so one thing you could do is to
> design your own DLT
>
> Add whatever meta data you want and then add the RTPS data at some
> position in that structure. You can try this out by using the USER DLTs in
> Wireshark
>
> Or if you do not want to request a DLT from tcpdump ( DO NOT USE ONE
> WITHOUT ALLOCATING IT) you could use the Exported PDU DLT defined by
> Wireshark
>
> Epan/exported_pdu.h contains some information. If you would require new
> elements for meta information that could be discussed. Adding RTSP data in
>
> An exported_pdu DLT frame should be simple as an initial test. I think
> there is a sharkfest presentation on how to add any protocol data in an
> exported pdu frame with text2pcap.
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
>
> *From:* Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Juanjo Martin Carrascosa
> *Sent:* den 15 januari 2020 12:24
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bypassing the first layer
>
>
>
> Hi Dario,
>
>
>
> Could you elaborate on this? I get the idea but my knowledge about the how
> is very basic.
>
>
>
> How can this help me achieve what I need?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Juanjo Martin
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:48 PM Dario Lombardo <lom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can use export_pdu. This is a layer with multiple attributes (see
> epan/exported_pdu.h), but the only really needed is the proto_name, that
> allows you to directly call a dissector by its name.
>
> You will have frames with this stack: FRAME/EXPORT PDU/RTPS, that is
> properly dissected by wireshark.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:33 PM Juanjo Martin Carrascosa <jua...@rti.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> RTPS is a protocol already supported by Wireshark. I have been helping
> maintain that protocol these past years. It sits on top of TCP and UDP, as
> well as some other transports that are not network ones (Shared Memory
> typically with a proprietary implementation).
>
>
>
> We are currently working on implementing a new logging mechanism for our
> product, mainly to address the Shared Memory scenario but it can also be
> really useful when RTPS is used on top of network protocols.
>
>
>
> Problem: We can log the RTPS layer but we don't have some information in
> our middleware like the Frame or Ethernet information, so we need to make
> it up. This is ugly, so I am trying to avoid that:
>
>
>
> How can I register a protocol so it is picked up instead of the Frame
> layer? This is, I want to create a new protocol that detects that the
> information we generate is for that protocol and the Frame protocol is not
> called, but the new protocol I am creating. This new protocol will then
> call the RTPS protocol to dissect the payload I want to display. We are
> planning to also add some information to this custom protocol, that's why I
> want it to be called first.
>
>
>
> Note: I just came up with this solution, but if you have a different
> solution for this, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Juanjo Martin
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Naima is online.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Juanjo Martin
>
> Principal Application Engineer
>
> EMEA Services Lead @ Professional Services Group
>
> Office: +34 958 27 88 62
>
> jua...@rti.com
>
> www.rti.com
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ef5c0e3a-b3d6db2c-ef5c4ea1-862f14a9365e-a65581b6c9ebf84e&q=1&e=75a63928-4ca4-405f-a42a-975bcffca831&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rti.com%2F>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe



-- 

Juanjo Martin
Principal Application Engineer
EMEA Services Lead @ Professional Services Group
Office: +34 958 27 88 62
jua...@rti.com
www.rti.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to