I second the idea of a name change and agree that I'd like to see the product's 
name return to Tango.

Perhaps I'm biased because I was a employee of EveryWare and Pervasive, 
(1995-2000 and I go back to version 1.0 of Tango) but I still refer to it today 
as Tango whenever it comes up in conversation. Tango rolls off the tongue, 
Witango never did.

And it was never as easy to explain what a .taf or .tcf file was after the name 
change. For those that aren't aware of the origins, .taf is Tango Application 
File and .tcf is Tango Class File.

Steve Smith

Oakbridge Information Solutions
Oakville Office:         (416) 628-0793
Cambridge Office:   (519) 489-0142
Email:  [email protected]
Web: www.oakbridge.ca

Certified DayLite Master Partner
Certified DayLite Trainer
Billings Consultant
FileMaker Business Alliance Member
MoneyWorks Consultant
LightSpeed Authorized Reseller

On 2010-10-20, at 5:14 AM, Wayne Irvine wrote:

> A rose would smell as sweet, yadda yadda.
>
> Just wondering about the name 'Witango'. I knew the product when it was 
> called Tango, which had a nice ring to it and brought about images of serious 
> gentlemen and ravishing ladies entwined in something that was midway between 
> a  dance and a domestic.
>
> I believe the name change was force on 'With Imagination' (there's a clue to 
> where the WI came from) when they negotiated rights to the product from 
> Everywhere (IIRC). I wonder if this requirement is still valid?
>
> I for one would love a return to the old name now that With Imagination (who 
> proved to be 'without' at least as far as Tango went) are no longer part of 
> the equation.
>
> Might also make the logo design a bit simpler.
>
> Wayne irvine
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
> with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.
>



----------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [email protected] 
with "unsubscribe witango-talk" in the body.

Reply via email to