Quoting 0xd34df00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi there! > My impression from Wt is that it is great and well-designed library > with quite unusual yet handy "style". > > I've been creating an application using C++/Qt which should provide > web-interface. As I've noticed, WAbstractItemModel is very similar to > QAbstractItemModel, so the simplest solution would be writing some > kind of proxy class from QAbstractItemModel to WAbstractItemModel. > Maybe the library would benefit if I try to write it in a reusable > manner and then create some kind of Qt-Wt wrapper library? That would > be a good start for that wrapper library, and interconnection with Qt > slots could be added later, as proposed in Wt's wiki. > > So the question is: does anybody need it? And if yes, what > recommendations etc. could you give?
I have long thought about creating a qt4towt from qt3toqt4 but never started. It should not be difficult for resemblant classes. Problem is, there are many Qt classes which do not have a counterpart in Wt. -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
