Hey! Pau, Why not initiate the project? As a Qt coder, it sounds good to me :) I've always been into rigorous integration of different framework and libraries including Gtk-Qt plugin mix. Sooner or later I'll be thinking of compiling Wt with Qt and I'm sure there won't be any problem. But, similar classes in Wt, will be a plus with an option to run on server or client side.
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > Quoting 0xd34df00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Hi there! >> My impression from Wt is that it is great and well-designed library >> with quite unusual yet handy "style". >> >> I've been creating an application using C++/Qt which should provide >> web-interface. As I've noticed, WAbstractItemModel is very similar to >> QAbstractItemModel, so the simplest solution would be writing some >> kind of proxy class from QAbstractItemModel to WAbstractItemModel. >> Maybe the library would benefit if I try to write it in a reusable >> manner and then create some kind of Qt-Wt wrapper library? That would >> be a good start for that wrapper library, and interconnection with Qt >> slots could be added later, as proposed in Wt's wiki. >> >> So the question is: does anybody need it? And if yes, what >> recommendations etc. could you give? >> > > I have long thought about creating a qt4towt from qt3toqt4 but never > started. It should not be difficult for resemblant classes. Problem > is, there are many Qt classes which do not have a counterpart in Wt. > > -- ABC-90106446 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
