Lubos Lunak wrote: >> It does make sense to me that certain apps (games, vmware) might say >> "cover multiple monitors" where the multiple monitors are distinct >> spaces (what I called "b)" originally) for all other apps. > > Why? I don't see a single reason why VMWare should be able to change how > Konqueror goes fullscreen.
I think you interpreted my comment backward from what I was trying to say, I didn't mean vmware should change the global state. > >> So I'd go >> with Elijah and say the hint makes sense, though I'm not clear yet on >> whether it should cover only fullscreen behavior or all "xinerama >> awareness" >> >> I do think some of the other issues raised need addressing, but they >> appear orthogonal to this hint since this hint assumes case b) and >> doesn't take a position on how we distinguish a) and b) > > And do we need to take position on a)? As you said, in such case Xinerama > settings should pretend there's no Xinerama. I think it would be better if the X server simply didn't report xinerama, but last time we tried the X hackers couldn't be convinced, so perhaps we need to set our own XSETTING-type global desktop property. Havoc _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
