As far as I can tell, reading through this again, people seem to be generally happy with the idea of a FULLSCREEN_MONITORS hint per-window. Is this actually the case, and if so, what happens next?
-David On 3/12/07, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lubos Lunak wrote: > >> It does make sense to me that certain apps (games, vmware) might say > >> "cover multiple monitors" where the multiple monitors are distinct > >> spaces (what I called "b)" originally) for all other apps. > > > > Why? I don't see a single reason why VMWare should be able to change how > > Konqueror goes fullscreen. > > I think you interpreted my comment backward from what I was trying to > say, I didn't mean vmware should change the global state. > > > > >> So I'd go > >> with Elijah and say the hint makes sense, though I'm not clear yet on > >> whether it should cover only fullscreen behavior or all "xinerama > >> awareness" > >> > >> I do think some of the other issues raised need addressing, but they > >> appear orthogonal to this hint since this hint assumes case b) and > >> doesn't take a position on how we distinguish a) and b) > > > > And do we need to take position on a)? As you said, in such case Xinerama > > settings should pretend there's no Xinerama. > > I think it would be better if the X server simply didn't report > xinerama, but last time we tried the X hackers couldn't be convinced, so > perhaps we need to set our own XSETTING-type global desktop property. > > Havoc > > _______________________________________________ > wm-spec-list mailing list > wm-spec-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list > _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
