On Thursday 29 of November 2007, Elijah Newren wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 8:30 AM, Lubos Lunak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That'a very good point. I myself don't see how one could reasonably > > handle anything that doesn't look like current Xinerama setups, except by > > simply ignoring the screens that don't fit. I'm pretty upset by > > libXinerama on openSUSE10.3 with Intel now claiming that there are e.g. > > two screens 1400x1050+0+0 and 1024x768+0+0. > > > > Which I guess means, unless somebody has some great idea, that we can > > ignore all this "RandR hotness". > > So, given that, what do you think about using a hint that specifies > width & height (small integers specifying monitor counts instead of > pixel counts) rather than having a strict set of monitors on which the > window must lie? Am I missing something?
That would be fine for the case I can easily imagine (video players), but I guess this really depends on how exactly VMWare would want to use this hint. And how it would cope with getting something different than it hoped for. -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 972 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http//www.suse.cz _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list wm-spec-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list