Gilbert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm attaching a tarball of 13 patches for evaluation & testing. These
> all apply to the latest devel sources from today. Most of the first
> patches are taken and updated from the ALT/Sisyphus linux srpm which
> was/is maintained by Alexy Voinov. One is a new patch which I
> created. The last ones are some patches that I found recently from a
> new BSD ports maintainer.
>
> Each patch is pretty well commented at the top and they are numbered
> for easier identification. At least one of them(01-WINGs-sowings.diff)
> will only apply cleanly after first running autogen.sh as it alters
> Makefile.am files which are not present in the raw repo sources.
>
> 00-WindowMaker-avoid_null_font.diff
> 01-WINGs-sowings.diff (This is needed for compiling/running wdm display
> manager)
This patch will have to be done differently - as it has to be
reproduceable if autogen.sh is run again.
> 02-WindowMaker-x86_64-mmx-fixes.diff
> 03-WindowMaker-maximize-borderless-fix-missing-pixels.diff
> 04-WindowMaker-xinerama-switchpanel-corruption-fix.diff
> 05-WindowMaker-textfield-adialog.diff (New feature)
> ( For some odd reason I cannot get the last fragment of this
> patch to work. It patches the file plmenu. It should be applied
> manually)
That last hunk by all means should apply. Is there a reason why the
order of XTerm and Run were changed?
Why was only plmenu changed, instead of including the translated
plmenus?
> 06-WindowMaker-singleclick.diff (New Feature)
This seems to be a popular feature.
> 07-WindowMaker-confirm_kill_show_app_name.diff
Looks like a good idea - will have to test this in practice.
> 08-WINGs_array_c.diff
> 09-WINGs_string_c.diff
> 10-WindowMaker-wtokensplit_no_null_argv.diff
> 11-WINGs_findfile_c.diff
> 12-WindowMaker-disable_unused_StartLogShell.diff
Deleting the function will be the better course of action.
> If anyone has a chance to have a look at these, please do. Getting
> them in mainline will greatly reduce the number of patches i use with
> wmaker and there is very little code added by these patches.
Most of these will go in with no problems. I still need to test them
all, but initial examination shows that most of these are good to go.
Thank you very much,
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http ((((
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[
as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html ((((
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
