On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:54:39PM +0800, Paul Harris wrote: > 2010/8/24 Andreas Tscharner <[email protected]> > > > On 24.08.2010 02:07, Paul Harris wrote: > >> > >> Note, I resolved it by: > >> aptitude install libwutil1, and the second calculated resolution option > >> was to also install libwings1 and reconfigure wmaker > >> > >> is there a way to avoid the error in the first place? > >> > >> > > Yes, the package should depend on the ones (libwutil1 & libwings1) you had > > to install afterwards > > > > > i thought wmaker did depend on libwutil1 etc, as it auto-selected them for > installation. however, during installation of libwutils1, it complained > that the lib was in wmaker (which was not yet removed). see log i > originally posted, all i did to get that was use aptitude to upgrade wmaker, > the other two came along for the ride automatically.
There should probably be some Replaces and/or Breaks headers in there somewhere. See http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces for possibly-helpful info. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
