I agree with you Rodolfo that it should be better to increase the minor version number instead.
On Saturday, December 6, 2014, Rodolfo García Peñas <k...@kix.es> wrote: > Hi, > > I think is better increase the REVISION number instead of the > WINGS_CURRENT when we are *adding* new functions. The new revision has > backward compatibility with previous versions of wmaker, so IMO is better > hold the library version number. We should avoid remove functions, because > other applications could use them. > > OTOH IMO we should change the library version number only one time in > every wmaker release. > > Cheers, > kix > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014, David Maciejak escribió: > > > This patch is incrementing version number as the API changed. > > > > --- > > configure.ac | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > > index 7097e9d..1dbba92 100644 > > --- a/configure.ac > > +++ b/configure.ac > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ > > WRASTER_VERSION=$WRASTER_CURRENT:$WRASTER_REVISION:$WRASTER_AGE > > AC_SUBST(WRASTER_VERSION) > > dnl > > dnl libWINGs > > -WINGS_CURRENT=3 > > +WINGS_CURRENT=4 > > WINGS_REVISION=0 > > WINGS_AGE=0 > > WINGS_VERSION=$WINGS_CURRENT:$WINGS_REVISION:$WINGS_AGE > > -- > > 2.1.0 > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Alexey I. Froloff <ra...@raorn.name > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:08:41PM +0800, David Maciejak wrote: > > >> +void WMSetWidgetBackgroundPixmap(WMWidget *w, WMPixmap *pix); > > >> + > > >> +WMPixmap *WMGetWidgetBackgroundPixmap(WMWidget *w); > > >> + > > > New public functions are added to the library. WINGS_VERSION > > > should be changed as described in info libtool (Updating version > > > info) - increment WINGS_CURRENT and set WINGS_REVISION to 0. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, -- > > > Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff > > > > -- > ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia > ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ >
