Hello,

I am not sure, but this patch is not the patch in the git. There are other 
patches about that later?

The difference is:

> -WINGS_AGE=0
> +WINGS_AGE=1

But in the git WINGS_AGE=0.

Cheers,
kix

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, David Maciejak escribió:

> ok patch enclosed.
> 
> Carlos could you please amend commit 467b7ee4560f124f7469a2a630cb35d477cc0444 
> ?
> 
> thx,
> david
> 
> [PATCH] WINGs: increment version
> 
> This patch is incrementing version number as the API changed.
> ---
>  WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h | 2 +-
>  configure.ac        | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h b/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h
> index ca7be55..4798174 100644
> --- a/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h
> +++ b/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>  #include <WINGs/WUtil.h>
>  #include <X11/Xlib.h>
> 
> -#define WINGS_H_VERSION  20140612
> +#define WINGS_H_VERSION  20141205
> 
> 
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index d7ccdae..326710d 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
> WRASTER_VERSION=$WRASTER_CURRENT:$WRASTER_REVISION:$WRASTER_AGE
>  AC_SUBST(WRASTER_VERSION)
>  dnl
>  dnl libWINGs
> -WINGS_CURRENT=3
> +WINGS_CURRENT=4
>  WINGS_REVISION=0
> -WINGS_AGE=0
> +WINGS_AGE=1
>  WINGS_VERSION=$WINGS_CURRENT:$WINGS_REVISION:$WINGS_AGE
>  AC_SUBST(WINGS_VERSION)
>  dnl
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Alexey I. Froloff <ra...@raorn.name> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:13:34AM +0800, David Maciejak wrote:
> >> -WINGS_CURRENT=3
> >> +WINGS_CURRENT=4
> >>  WINGS_REVISION=0
> >>  WINGS_AGE=0
> > I should read more docs, before suggesting.  WINGS_AGE should
> > also be increased according to info libtool...
> >
> > --
> > Regards,    --
> > Sir Raorn.   --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff



-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.

Reply via email to