Hello, I am not sure, but this patch is not the patch in the git. There are other patches about that later?
The difference is: > -WINGS_AGE=0 > +WINGS_AGE=1 But in the git WINGS_AGE=0. Cheers, kix On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, David Maciejak escribió: > ok patch enclosed. > > Carlos could you please amend commit 467b7ee4560f124f7469a2a630cb35d477cc0444 > ? > > thx, > david > > [PATCH] WINGs: increment version > > This patch is incrementing version number as the API changed. > --- > WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h | 2 +- > configure.ac | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h b/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h > index ca7be55..4798174 100644 > --- a/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h > +++ b/WINGs/WINGs/WINGs.h > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > #include <WINGs/WUtil.h> > #include <X11/Xlib.h> > > -#define WINGS_H_VERSION 20140612 > +#define WINGS_H_VERSION 20141205 > > > #ifdef __cplusplus > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index d7ccdae..326710d 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ > WRASTER_VERSION=$WRASTER_CURRENT:$WRASTER_REVISION:$WRASTER_AGE > AC_SUBST(WRASTER_VERSION) > dnl > dnl libWINGs > -WINGS_CURRENT=3 > +WINGS_CURRENT=4 > WINGS_REVISION=0 > -WINGS_AGE=0 > +WINGS_AGE=1 > WINGS_VERSION=$WINGS_CURRENT:$WINGS_REVISION:$WINGS_AGE > AC_SUBST(WINGS_VERSION) > dnl > -- > 2.1.0 > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Alexey I. Froloff <ra...@raorn.name> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:13:34AM +0800, David Maciejak wrote: > >> -WINGS_CURRENT=3 > >> +WINGS_CURRENT=4 > >> WINGS_REVISION=0 > >> WINGS_AGE=0 > > I should read more docs, before suggesting. WINGS_AGE should > > also be increased according to info libtool... > > > > -- > > Regards, -- > > Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.