On Friday 2015-08-14 11:06:16 Doug Torrance wrote:
> On 08/14/2015 10:48 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) 
wrote:
> >> This patch includes the library wmgeneral.
> > 
> > Please, don't do it!  There's already libdockapp, why would we
> > need yet another _shared_ library with, like, five functions?
> > What are you trying to fix?  Does it really worth it?  You only
> > make things harder for a package maintainers.
> > 
> > Better rewrite those applets to libdockapp.
> 
> Speaking as the package maintainer for ~30 dockapps in Debian, I think
> this is a great idea and makes it easier for me, not harder.
> 
> For example, dockapps that use wmgeneral/list.c were recently not able
> to compile with gcc5, and I've had to fix this individually in all my
> wmgeneral dockapps in Debian.  If the shared library had already
> existed, I wouldn't have had to touch these packages individually and
> just the library could have been updated.
> 
> Certainly there would be the initial headache of packaging wmgeneral and
> changing some lines of code in each dockapp to use the new library, but
> it seems worth it to me.
> 
> As far as there being two libraries, wmgeneral is by far more common.  I
> believe there's around 13 in the dockapps git repository that use it,
> but only one or two that use libdockapp.  It would be a lot of work to
> port them all.  On the other hand, I think libdockapp has a better,
> more intuitive interface.
> 
> Just my two cents,
> Doug
> 
> P.S. On a related note, I'd like to add the new library to the dockapps
> portion of the website, but we need a version number to create a git tag
> for my script to work.  I suppose libwmgeneral-1.0 would be fine?

I don't remember that I have ever had to compile wmgeneral library for the
dockapps I am using but I might be wrong.
On the other hand I am sure that some of the dockapps I am using depend on
the libdockapp (e.g. wmnetload).


-- 
Josip Deanovic


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.

Reply via email to