On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 at 16:59:59 +0100, PERROTON, Laurent wrote: > 2016-01-26 15:34 GMT+01:00 Alwin <[email protected]>: > > > Personally, I think no... :-) There are more ways and personal > > preferences like Laurent showed. > > > > > >> We should create a patch? > >> > >> In Debian, wmaker could require imagemagick. > >> > > > > ...but on the other hand, if imagemagick support is compiled-in, it could > > be a useful example? > > > > +1 > > I think creating a dependency just for screen capture would go against unix > design rules: keep it simple and modular. There are multiple ways to > perform screen capture under X11/wmaker and bind it to a shortcut (xwd, > xv, shutter, scrot, import, gimp, even ffmpeg...just to name a few). The > most important is to document it so that anybody can find it when they need > to, including it as example scripts is a great idea.
Another approach is to patch wmgenmenu in order to include a screenshot menu if and only if the appropriate program is already installed. But I agree that documenting the several options is a good idea. It is a pity that we don't get any patches adding documentation in the windowmaker webpage (the repo is here: git://repo.or.cz/whome.git). This example menu would be a good example of what people could add to the webpage. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
