On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:42:50PM +0100, Denis Grelich wrote: > I don't like this idea. The 9P interface is very easy to use and keeps > interaction pretty straightforward. I doubt the difference would be > gigantic (there definitely would be one, though), since you still have > all the brakes of the shell -- standalone processes for every string > manipulation and maybe calculation. It could be even worse: if you have > only one channel to communicate, you have to do much more serious > parsing. What you would lose on the other hand is quite some > flexibility. I think paying the price of 9P is alright. It might be > something different on old and slow machines, but I don't want to think > of wmii as a »poor man's« window manager. Anyway, these are thoughts > for wmii-4 already.
Fine with me, it was just an idea. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
