Hi Sanjiva,
Development had already started on the WSDL 2.0 validating parser but the parser was not yet well developed. The parser was donated and development is now continuing at Apache with the Woden project.
Woden is currently being developed using the public SVN repository. I agree that it doesn't make sense to develop in a closed or private setting and that is certainly not the intention of the few of us working on Woden. If it seems that way it's probably because so far John Kaputin has made the bulk of the code contribution. I'd also like to see more discussion on this list and also agree that input from interested groups (such as Axis, Eclipse, and the W3C) will be beneficial at this early stage of development. Arthur Ryman is acting as the W3C WSDL 2.0 working group representative and I am acting as the Eclipse WTP representative to this project. I know John has been in touch with someone from Axis but can you act as a representative for Axis and bring Axis related concerns to the attention of this list? If not, is there someone else you can recommend to fill this role?
Thanks,
Lawrence
| Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/13/2005 01:07 AM
|
|
So if this project was approved for incubation *without* code that's,
um, a bit unusual .. I guess I missed that! (Look at the incubation
guidelines - the first point is "must have code".) Dims, am I missing
something??
Now given that situation, if you're writing the code *now*, why does it
make sense to write it closed in a private setting? I'd much rather
discuss design and issues before all the code is written rather than the
other way around. That is, bring the whole thing to this list now rather
than later.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 00:49 -0400, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
>
> Sanjiva,
>
> Development has started on the WSDL 2.0 validating parser. As detailed
> in the proposal, this parser will support both DOM and StAX which will
> allow both Axis and the Eclipse Web Tools Platform project to use the
> parser. As it's been explained to me, the Woden model will be wrapped
> in the Axis WOM for use in Axis.
>
> WRT the incoming code, are you referring to WSDL4J? If so, again as
> was detailed in the proposal, WSDL 1.1 processing is a longer term
> goal of the Woden project. The initial goal is to create a WSDL 2.0
> validating parser.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
> Sanjiva Weerawarana
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 06/12/2005 12:16 AM
> Please respond to
> woden-dev
>
>
>
>
> To
> [email protected]
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Fw:
> Copyright's for
> incoming projects
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Guys, what's going on with this project? Incubatees are supposed to
> have
> some incoming code .. what's the status of that?
>
> I'd like to understand the plan for merging this with the work being
> done in Axis2 on modeling WSDL 2.0.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 13:44 -0400, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> >
> > Saw this on the ws.apache.org list. Thought it might be useful if
> and
> > when
> > WSDL4J is merges with Woden.
> >
> > Lawrence
> >
> > ----- Forwarded by Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM on 06/11/2005 01:43
> PM
> > -----
> > Davanum Srinivas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > 06/10/2005 04:33 PM
> > Please respond to
> > general
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Copyright's for
> > incoming projects
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ken,
> >
> > Digging back on the emails...Is this the final word on how Derby was
> > handled?
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03674.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > dims
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
