Lawrence, Actually, for the record, it was Jeremy raising the IRI issue in item 4 :)
Kind Regards, Graham. _____________________________________________ Graham C Turrell CEng, MBCS Chartered IT Practitioner WebSphere ESB Foundation Technologies DE3F16 / MP 211 IBM Labs Hursley Park Winchester, Hampshire England. SO21 2JN Tel +44-(0)1962-815018 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "No army can withstand the force of an idea whose time has come.". -Victor Hugo Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/11/2006 17:12:52: > > Attendees: Lawrence Mandel, Jeremy Hughes, Graham Turrell, John > Kaputin, Arthur Ryman > > Minutes > > 1. Open Action Items - Lawrence Mandel > > 2006-10-07 - John will update the task list with up-to-date task > information and links to Jiras. > 2006-11-21 > John: I did some of the work today. I'll try to get this done by ournext call. > > 2. Interop Event Summary - John Kaputin, Arthur Ryman > > See Jonathan Marsh's summary Lawrence forwarded to woden-dev. > > Arthur provided a summary of the event. > > We discussed the current status of the report and took a look at the > documents for which Woden is currently failing. > > [action] Arthur will open Jiras for the interchange failures. > > [action] Lawrence will open Jiras for the validation failures. > > 3. Milestone (M7) Status - John Kaputin > > John: We need to decide what content we need in M7. > Lawrence: Is there an immediate need for an M7? > John: I think the need is for people we don't know about as Axis2 is > working off snapshots and their next release isn't for a little > while. I think we should do M7 ASAP after we decide the Jiras that > should be included. > > [action] Everyone should verify and close any Jiras they've opened > that have been resolved but not closed. > > We proceeded through the open Jiras and assigned those required for > M7 to the M7 version. The conversation will be picked up on next > week's call at Woden-39. > > 4.Development Discussion - All > > Graham: The issue came up with the IRI in WS-commons. I think we > need to consider the benefits before using this as if Java 7 > includes IRI we may need to deprecate a lot of our API. > Lawrence: Does switching to IRIs buy us much? > Graham: I don't think so. Just a specific case in HTTP bindings. > Also, this IRI implementation is currently part of a podling and > will need to be factored out and contributed to a commons project > before we can make use of it. > > 5. Other Business - All > > No other business was raised. > > > Thanks, > > Lawrence Mandel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
