I seem to be going backwards with the M7 release due to the amount of 
uber-churn going with the WSDL2 spec.  Not actually in the editor's copies 
of Part1 and Part2, but in the CR issues list and the test suite. The 
Part1 and Part2 docs no longer match the test suite, but I guess there are 
editorial actions assigned that will bring them up to date. 

Earlier in the week I had to fix some Woden testcase failures after CR145 
change the scope of shema components in the component model. Then after my 
last post about CR138, I had to modify InterfaceFault and WsdlCm to 
support the new {message content model} property. Having regenerated 
Woden's interchange test results I now find 4 new failures - one because 
of an error in the canonical baseline for a new testcase SAWSDL-0G and 3 
MessageTest failures because {http transfer encoding} has been renamed to 
{http content encoding} by CR143.

I realize that these changes are a necessary part of finalizing the CR 
spec and moving it to PR (well, except for the baseline error), but it 
makes it difficult to complete M7 given that our key release defining 
criteria is 'all green' on the Component Model Interchange testcases and 
it's this part of the WSDL 2.0 test suite that keeps changing.

I think we have two choices with M7:

1) we stick with our existing release defining criteria and wait for the 
WSDL2 churn to stop before attempting an M7 release

2) we drop the 'all green' criteria and release M7 as it is, then do an M8 
release soon afterwards for these final CR spec changes (maybe M8 could 
match a new PR spec). 

I won't have much time next week to keep on fixing Woden to match a moving 
test suite and then recreating the candidate M7 build to try to get a 
release vote started.  Let me know what you think.

regards,
John Kaputin






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU





Reply via email to