John, Woden should simply ignore the WS-A and SAWDSL extensions. No impact to the component model since these are unknown to Woden and not marked as required.
-- Arthur On 2/10/07, John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a new candidate build for M7 and will upload the files to people.apache.org and request the release vote later today. I changed Woden to accommodate CR143 (transfer coding renamed to content encoding) and as at 11PM GMT 10th February Woden attempts and passes all of the 80 testcases in the 'good' bucket that relate to the WSDL 2.0spec....all green! I have update the Release Notes to state this compliance as at 10th Feb and mention that the spec and test suite may change post-M7. Note, there are another 15 testcases in this bucket for WS-A and SAWSDL extensions which Woden does not support (I'm not yet really sure why these are in with the Component Model Tests anyway). I have committed the ant-test results to SVN so Arthur, perhaps you could regen the Dashboard. regards, John Kaputin *"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/02/2007 11:02 Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: WSDL2 churn is slowing down M7 I'm also +1 on getting the release out - with the necessary release notes to say what the limitations are. Thanks John for all your work on this. Jeremy On 09/02/07, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to Arthur's suggestion. There are more changes coming to WSDL 2.0. > Woden needs to make it's own progress and declaring a milestone is a big > part of this. Let's take a cut now and call it M7. > > Lawrence > > > > > Arthur Ryman/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 02/09/2007 02:33 PM > Please respond to > [email protected] > > > To > [email protected] > cc > [email protected] > Subject > Re: WSDL2 churn is slowing down M7 > > > > > > > > John, > > There are more changes coming so let's release M7 since we acheived Green > on the test suite as it was when we set our goals. > > Arthur Ryman, > IBM Software Group, Rational Division > > blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 02/09/2007 01:55 PM > > Please respond to > [email protected] > > > To > [email protected] > cc > > Subject > WSDL2 churn is slowing down M7 > > > > > > > > > > I seem to be going backwards with the M7 release due to the amount of > uber-churn going with the WSDL2 spec. Not actually in the editor's copies > of Part1 and Part2, but in the CR issues list and the test suite. The > Part1 and Part2 docs no longer match the test suite, but I guess there are > editorial actions assigned that will bring them up to date. > > Earlier in the week I had to fix some Woden testcase failures after CR145 > change the scope of shema components in the component model. Then after my > last post about CR138, I had to modify InterfaceFault and WsdlCm to > support the new {message content model} property. Having regenerated > Woden's interchange test results I now find 4 new failures - one because > of an error in the canonical baseline for a new testcase SAWSDL-0G and 3 > MessageTest failures because {http transfer encoding} has been renamed to > {http content encoding} by CR143. > > I realize that these changes are a necessary part of finalizing the CR > spec and moving it to PR (well, except for the baseline error), but it > makes it difficult to complete M7 given that our key release defining > criteria is 'all green' on the Component Model Interchange testcases and > it's this part of the WSDL 2.0 test suite that keeps changing. > > I think we have two choices with M7: > > 1) we stick with our existing release defining criteria and wait for the > WSDL2 churn to stop before attempting an M7 release > > 2) we drop the 'all green' criteria and release M7 as it is, then do an M8 > release soon afterwards for these final CR spec changes (maybe M8 could > match a new PR spec). > > I won't have much time next week to keep on fixing Woden to match a moving > test suite and then recreating the candidate M7 build to try to get a > release vote started. Let me know what you think. > > regards, > John Kaputin > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------ * * *Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU *
