Thank you Lawrence for your reply. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Dilshan, > > I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either > naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your > implementation. > > Lawrence > > > > From: Dilshan Edirisuriya <[email protected]> To: > [email protected] Date: 06/09/2010 07:37 AM Subject: [proposal] name > prefix for new read/write interfaces > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi, > > Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first > patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some > doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA > issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using > the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best > approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are > my suggestions. > > 1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable" > > e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription > > 2.) Use "E" > > e.g - EBinding , EDescription > > > Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are > welcome. > > > [1] - > *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20> > > > Thank You, > > Regards, > > Dilshan > > >
