Dilshan , Since we are planning to have M9 release soon it is better to do your improvements in a branch so I have created a woden-20[1] branch for you. Please create your patches based on this branch and attach to Woden-20 JIRA issue.
[1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/woden/branches/woden-20/ Thanks, On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dilshan Edirisuriya <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank you Lawrence for your reply. > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Hi Dilshan, >> >> I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either >> naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your >> implementation. >> >> Lawrence >> >> >> >> From: Dilshan Edirisuriya <[email protected]> To: >> [email protected] Date: 06/09/2010 07:37 AM Subject: [proposal] >> name prefix for new read/write interfaces >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first >> patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some >> doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA >> issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using >> the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best >> approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are >> my suggestions. >> >> 1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable" >> >> e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription >> >> 2.) Use "E" >> >> e.g - EBinding , EDescription >> >> >> Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are >> welcome. >> >> >> [1] - >> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20> >> >> >> Thank You, >> >> Regards, >> >> Dilshan >> >> >> > -- Sagara Gunathunga Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
