Sean, I would make almost the opposite edits to the charter than you. I think it is really helpful that the charter lists different existing proposals (JWT, SWT, MagicSigs, JSS, JSMS). They provides a great context for the WG; they show different approaches; they show people want something in this space. I think most of the JSON background can be dropped.
>Thanks for kicking this off Hannes. In Prague, I thought the goal was >pretty straightforward: JSONize CMS. To that end I think we can clip >out some of the references to work already done. The BOF can decide >later what draft is the basis for the starting point. ... <delete> > Different proposals for providing these > security services have been defined and implemented. Examples are: JSON > Web Token [JWT], Simple Web Tokens [SWT], Magic Signatures > [MagicSignatures], JSON Simple Sign [JSS], JavaScript Message Security > Format [JSMS]. </delete> _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
