3 & 4 there look a bit like scope-creep to me Why are they absolutely needed?
S. On 16/06/11 18:33, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > Slight tweaks > > > On 6/16/11 11:26 AM, "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1) A JSON-based method of applying digital signatures and keyed message >> digests to data that may represent JSON data structures. > > ... may represent arbitrary data, including JSON data structures and text > >> 2) A JSON-based method of applying encryption to data that may represent >> JSON data structures. > > Same as 1) above. Not just for JSON. > >> Separately, we may want to consider whether the following should be in scope: >> >> 3) A JSON-based method of representing public keys. >> >> Also, please update and/or add these references (some were out of date, some >> were missing): > > Let's also add: > > 4) Any JSON-specific prerequisite tooling such as JSON Schema > > And add draft-zyp-json-schema as a reference. I CC'd Kris Zyp to see if > he's ok with that. Kris: this might be a chance for a WG to pick up JSON > Schema if you like. > _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
