I guess I'd worry about the added time if its a dependency but maybe there're ways around that. (Developing new schema stuff sounds to me like a slooow thing;-)
S On 16 Jun 2011, at 20:43, "Peter Saint Andre" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that seems not unreasonable. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Joe Hildebrand > To: Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> > Cc: Mike Jones <[email protected]>; Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - > FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; ext Manger, James H > <[email protected]>; Sean Turner <[email protected]>; > [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Peter > Saint Andre; Pete Resnick <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu Jun 16 12:21:56 2011 > Subject: Re: [woes] WOES Charter Proposal > > Agree that 4 is scope creep that is outside of the scope of normal security > area stuff, but it's likely to be a prereq. I'm fine with dropping it from > the charter, potentially getting support from the Apps ADs to move stuff > like JSON Schema through the Apps AWG. > > > On 6/16/11 11:51 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> 3 & 4 there look a bit like scope-creep to me >> >> Why are they absolutely needed? >> >> S. >> >> On 16/06/11 18:33, Joe Hildebrand wrote: >>> Slight tweaks >>> >>> >>> On 6/16/11 11:26 AM, "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> 1) A JSON-based method of applying digital signatures and keyed message >>>> digests to data that may represent JSON data structures. >>> >>> ... may represent arbitrary data, including JSON data structures and text >>> >>>> 2) A JSON-based method of applying encryption to data that may represent >>>> JSON data structures. >>> >>> Same as 1) above. Not just for JSON. >>> >>>> Separately, we may want to consider whether the following should be in >>>> scope: >>>> >>>> 3) A JSON-based method of representing public keys. >>>> >>>> Also, please update and/or add these references (some were out of date, >>>> some >>>> were missing): >>> >>> Let's also add: >>> >>> 4) Any JSON-specific prerequisite tooling such as JSON Schema >>> >>> And add draft-zyp-json-schema as a reference. I CC'd Kris Zyp to see if >>> he's ok with that. Kris: this might be a chance for a WG to pick up JSON >>> Schema if you like. >>> > > -- > Joe Hildebrand > _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
