-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2011 06:59 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> I now find myself hoping this is not the beginning someone making a case
> for ASN.1 encoding in WOES.
>
> For my edification, can someone comment on how CMS would likely be
> referenced in WOES? Would it likely be a normative reference (i.e. key
> transport/wrapping, as it is in xmlenc-core), or otherwise would it
> probably be just informational?
We seem to be bike-shedding on the words "based on" in the charter.
Perhaps it helps if we say something to the effect that WOES draws
upon experience from CMS and XML-dsig/enc and leave it at that.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4tpNUACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneP8gCeLjYv+kANjaZZ9HClXMejIVfh
UcMAoMHo3lG3p9TuFF8Jnn7Ov8E9aGYW
=pe1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
woes mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
