+1 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:29 AM To: Matt Miller Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [woes] New WOES charter proposal
That works for me. Certainly when I talk about basing something on CMS, what I mean is that I'm imitating CMS, not that there is a normative dependency. -Ekr On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Matt Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2011, at 13:16, Leif Johansson wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/25/2011 06:59 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote: >>> I now find myself hoping this is not the beginning someone making a >>> case for ASN.1 encoding in WOES. >>> >>> For my edification, can someone comment on how CMS would likely be >>> referenced in WOES? Would it likely be a normative reference (i.e. >>> key transport/wrapping, as it is in xmlenc-core), or otherwise would >>> it probably be just informational? >> >> We seem to be bike-shedding on the words "based on" in the charter. >> Perhaps it helps if we say something to the effect that WOES draws >> upon experience from CMS and XML-dsig/enc and leave it at that. >> > > +1 > > > - m&m > > Matt Miller - <[email protected]> > Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > woes mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes > > _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
