+1 on joes or jose as well. Phil
On 2011-07-27, at 20:00, Thomas Hardjono <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 JOSE or JOES > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Bradley > [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:56 PM > To: Leif Johansson > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [woes] naming > > +1 JOSE > > On 2011-07-27, at 4:54 PM, Leif Johansson wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/27/2011 10:13 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote: >>> +0 to ESJA >>> +1 to JOSE or JOES. >>> -1 to WOES. >> >> SCHMOES ? >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAk4wevMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncqmQCfS9hLhQzuduhsqmfYBvgsw/pG >> WQkAn2CNYOhqo3vgwkQAlGoy8zaYKtrT >> =Vimg >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> woes mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes > > _______________________________________________ > woes mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
