+1 JOES/JOSE On Jul 27, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Phillip Hunt wrote:
> +1 on joes or jose as well. > > Phil > > On 2011-07-27, at 20:00, Thomas Hardjono <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> +1 JOSE or JOES >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of John >> Bradley [[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:56 PM >> To: Leif Johansson >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [woes] naming >> >> +1 JOSE >> >> On 2011-07-27, at 4:54 PM, Leif Johansson wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 07/27/2011 10:13 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote: >>>> +0 to ESJA >>>> +1 to JOSE or JOES. >>>> -1 to WOES. >>> >>> SCHMOES ? >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAk4wevMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncqmQCfS9hLhQzuduhsqmfYBvgsw/pG >>> WQkAn2CNYOhqo3vgwkQAlGoy8zaYKtrT >>> =Vimg >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> woes mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> woes mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes > _______________________________________________ > woes mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
