On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Looks good, although the dates seem a mite aggressive, especially since > it's doubtful that the WG would be approved this month (given the need > for internal IESG review, external review, and an IESG decision).
There is nothing stopping the two sets of authors from working together pre-WG. :-) --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
