On 8/3/11 2:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 8/3/11 2:33 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote: > >> Also, will RFC4627 be "upgraded" to standards track? > > There's no real need -- most of the media type registration RFCs are > informational. However, we might want to look at the entire "stack" of > JSON-related specs and move them all to standards track (media type, > schema, etc.).
Clarification: by "we" I do *not* mean the (presumptive) JOSE WG. /psa _______________________________________________ woes mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
