On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 13:38:35 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 16, 2025 12:30:27 AM CET Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15 2025 at 14:07, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 14:05:56 -0500 > > > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> As Dave responded to Luis, although that is a good idea, it's out of > > >> scope for this document (for now). > > > > > > I should have said it's out of scope for this patch, not document. The > > > point is that what tag to use for this is a separate discussion. > > > > Which should be held in the context of this patch to make it complete. > > I agree, it would be good to get it all done in one go. > > It's still out of scope of this patch. As the change log states: Note, though, there are fundamentally no new or unique rules in this new document. It clarifies expectations that the kernel community has had for many years. A tag is a new rule. This document is to express existing behavior. Adding a tag that currently doesn't match existing behavior should be a separate patch. -- Steve
