http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Thomas Bøge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Bøge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-11 16:14:18 ---
I guess I have not explaint why I would like the (poosibly unclean
implementation of) /noremove feature.
I am using wpkg to both fully managed workstations and "partly managed". I
fully agree, that there is no need for /noremove for fully managed
workstations.
With "partly managed" I mean workstations, configured and managed by end-users
(powerusers), where I provide an easy way to install a subset of all my
packages, represented by a certain profile. Since powerusers don't like that
software is removed without their accept, but need an easy way to install a lot
of common software, /noremove is an ideal solution for me.
I realise, that I could make copies of all my packages, rename them and remove
<remove...> and change execute to once. But that would almost double my work
with maintaining packages.
I am not a trained user of bugzilla, so don't know if it good behavior to
reopen this feature-request with only 1 vote. But anyway, please reconsider
"wontfix"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
-------------------------------------------------------
Easy Software Deployment >> http://wpkg.org
_______________________________________________
wpkg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wpkg-users
