http://www.fractal.com.mx/F25ineditos.html
http://www.artandmedicine.com/about/2004/Hydrocephaly2.jpg http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/HumanBioogy/Finished% 20Images/Hydrocephaly/babies16.jpg http://hugsandhope.org/tabitham.jpg http://www.consultsos.com/pandora/images/i0508.jpg Abwege! Storung! Irrthum! Irrthum! Whip the Rabbit! Ic(h) Unsinnschmieren macht.. Whip the Rabbit! Unheimlich manoever! H(e)'s not a *real* letter... "Aaaaaah, I'm Melting....." Oropedia Las Graf Zeppelin.. Oh, the Shoe-manity.. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: WRYTING-L : Writing and Theory across Disciplines > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Jorgensen > > Sent: viernes, 26 de agosto de 2005 13:56 > > To: WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA > > Subject: MASTURBATION > > > > > > What do 'you people' do here. Write. Pontificate. > > Create a community in which to feel SPECIAL. Or, I > > wonder, is this simply a place where perverts come, > > and those who like to watch, listen. And for that > > gimp, that inevitably will say that art is whatever! > > FO! > > > > AJ > > > > --- Lanny Quarles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > oops you're talking about Clark Coolidge's Crystal > > > Text > > > that line about the crystal being the opposite of > > > history > > > through me for a loop i guess.. but any comments > > > still apprec. > > > > > > duh > > > lq > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Lanny Quarles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <WRYTING-L@listserv.utoronto.ca> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:57 PM > > > Subject: Studio as History > > > > > > > > > > Hey Ryan, > > > > I'm reading _Studio as History_ by Ryan White > > > > this is you right? > > > > > > > > the introduction is interesting, especially this: > > > > > > > > Here the crystal - the very opposite of the > > > historical > > > > -as the poet's refractory tool, appears as the > > > index of > > > > a certain aesthetic occurence; an occurence of an > > > aesthetic. > > > > The crystal's making-strange of the 'everyday' is > > > nothing > > > > other than the action of a naturalism understood > > > as ahistorical: > > > > it is refractory an hard, simply a part of the > > > ground, one of those > > > > things which happens before judgement, language, > > > economy. > > > > > > > > Why is the crystal the very opposite of the > > > historical. (or is it history in the sense of > > > ideological historicism as > > > > "history") > > > > It seems to me that in its oddly constrained > > > morphology via language materiality, > > > > 'the mechanical', and the process of feedback, > > > with all kinds of attendant > > > > distortions, the crystal or in Wolframist terms > > > 'computationalism' > > > > seems as good a way of describing culture as an > > > autonomous meta-biological > > > > entity (shades of ?White) as any.. The Ahistorical > > > naturalism.. is this the infinity > > > > of unrecordable minutiae that performs the > > > 'content' of history? and is this minutiae > > > > the substance of an aesthetic 'occurence', a > > > 'refractory' tool? or perhaps some kind of > > > deanthropomorphisation > > > > of the subject read as a universal instantiation > > > of arbitrariness re: carbon, etc. > > > > There's some post-structuralism haunting this.. at > > > any rate straighten me out here, > > > > i think i'm already flummoxed!! with this thing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com >
