Leo, that is indeed a good point. As much as I enjoy [EMAIL PROTECTED], I find that the WSG list provides good information on real world implementation, which is not really discussed on these other lists.
I agree that volume here should be kept to a minimum, but I wouldn't call its current activity high volume by a long shot, if you want volume join something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] :| Pushing the idea of reading and searching the WSG mail archive before posting is a good way to reduce lots of repeat questions. Overall I think the list is great. Regards Chris Blown http://hinterlands.com.au > As such we need to discuss the evolving nature of web standards. But > in the real world web standards are not an isolated topic. The debate > cannot be conducted at the academic level without the experiences of > what works and what doesn't. I believe and sense that the dedicated > people here realize that for web standards to work in the field they > must be experienced and explored in the field. > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
