hmm, nobody wants to help or give away their secret strategies? or nobody does browser testing? Or do I smell?
Mt. > -----Original Message----- > From: Miles Tillinger > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:42 PM > To: Web Standards Group (E-mail) > Subject: [WSG] Browser testing across Windows OS's > > > Hi all, > > I'm working on improving the site testing procedures here at > work. I'm trying to gauge the need to test browsers on the > different Windows (and other) OS's. I'm using the > standalone IE's under Windows XP and I'm wondering if the > IE5.5 standalone is behaving exactly the same as an > integrated IE5.5 installation on Windows 2000, ME or 98(SE)? > E.g. Are there any HTML, Javascript or CSS bugs that are > present in IE5.5 Win2k, but not IE5.5 WinXP? Same question > for Netscape, Mozilla and other browsers. Are they mostly > identical across the various OS's they support? > > Evolt.org's testing chart only includes Windows, not the > individual versions > (http://evolt.org/article/Browser_testing_list/20/548/index.ht ml looks rather old). Nor does it talk about different versions of MacOS. Do WSG members consider this sufficient testing strategy? I understand this is probably going to be very different from one organisation to another but there has to be a baseline at least! I'm keen to hear some opinions and get some good resources on this to hopefully get an idea of how far I need to take our testing strategy. Thanks in advance, Miles. ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ***************************************************** ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************