Fair question, James.

A forum component for ASP.NET will not output HTML (<input type="text"
id="Title" />). Rather, it will inject ASP.NET server controls (<asp:Textbox
id="Title" runat="server" />).

The component developers are not forced to do this. They *could* output
static and valid XHTML if they wanted. However, by injecting ASP.NET server
controls rather than outputting HTML, such components leverage the power of
ASP.NET. And the ASP.NET server controls *are* amazingly clever. The single
downside of injecting server controls is that these controls do not output
standards compliant XHTML.

If anyone wants more information about ASP.NET, they are welcome to contact
me. However, I don't want to skew this discussion away from the original
question.

Regards,
Alister


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] standards compliant .NET modules


> Hi
> Surely a .net developer can write their own function to output compliant
> markup? seems strange that a language forces someone to use inbuilt
modules.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
> SomeNewKid wrote:
>
> >The ASP.NET framework does not produce standards compliant XHTML. Hence,
no
> >off-the-shelf forum component for ASP.NET will produce valid XHTML.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *****************************************************
>
>
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to