Do not count on seeing STRONG removed. There is a purpose
for it.
B
and I are still used in current versions. However, B and I have been
removed from all future versions of XHTML.
EM is not being removed or questioned. So, why do you think STRONG
will be removed? Just because there is a note doesn't mean
anything.
Lee Roberts
From: Mordechai Peller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Styling Text... With XSLT, making the change shouldn't be difficult; that's one of the advantages of XHTML. But then I'd be careful with strong if I were you. They're thinking of giving strong the ax. Once a DTD is finalized, the philosophies which went into creating it cease being relevant. Philosophy is a matter of grays; a collection of rules for a computer to follow are black and white. Where philosophy can come into play is in how to follow those rules, including, as in this case, which to ignore. The tools has been provided (the DTD); what can and can not be done with it is not open to debate. How to use it is where the question lies. And I believe it's there that we can find agreement. I wasn't saying what is best; just what's possible. The quality of the questions and quiz aside, why do you think the author doesn't understand WCAG!? My impression was the opposite. |
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Geoff Deering
- Re: [WSG] Styling Text... Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Geoff Deering
- Re: [WSG] Styling Text... Rick Faaberg
- Re: [WSG] Styling Text... Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Geoff Deering
- Re: [WSG] Styling Text... Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Geoff Deering
- Re: [WSG] Styling Text... Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Geoff Deering
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... Lee Roberts
- RE: [WSG] Styling Text... John . Cherry