It is, in my experience, best to start with the closest implementation to the standards you can find (in this case I choose Firefox/Gecko) and then code for the exceptional cases. If you start from an outlying position (for example IE 5/Win) and then try to work the other way you will find that your efforts will need to be much greater and your CSS will be much muddier. It is better to start with a 'pure' framework and then include the handling for exceptional cases in a modular fashion.

I also take issue with the practicality of installing all browsers that could possibly view your site given the variety of operating systems (have you tested using NetPositive on BeOS lately?) and devices.

Mark Harwood <WebMail> wrote:

A good developer should have all browser installed which everone he uses as his default is down to his personal prefrence neither give you an advantage over the
other, as we should all be looking at supporting them all!





*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************




Reply via email to