Hi Moorey The site looks lovely, aesthetically it's a great job.
There are some problems though: 1. Load time is excessive, due to the overall bulk of the page - 350Kb+ is about 290Kb too much for one page. 2. No access keys. 3. Images As Text - you have used images to represent text, without using any image replacement techniques. This renders your top horizontal navigation incomprehensible to non-image browsers or those with images turned off. 4. Titles Tags - your links do not have any title tags - these can be quite valuable when used correctly. That's all for now. But as I said, design wise it's awfully pretty. It needs a bit of work yet from a usability and accessibility standpoint though, as just validating your code isn't an indication of these standards. Natalie :) -- -- Freelance Website Designer/Developer www.pixelkitty.net ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
