On 6/12/04 9:31 PM, "Mordechai Peller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Time to call a truce? >> > I am unwilling to change my view as I've seen no reason to do so; in > fact, I believe even more strongly now in what I'm saying that I did > when this discussion began. If you want to leave it at that, I won't > object (not that an objection would be worth much, anyway). > OK, time to wrap this up methinks, as you seem to be getting a little testy here Mordechai (and I'm sure this issue's had more than enough air time now). By calling a truce I'm not asking you to change your mind, nor has that been my goal throughout this discussion. I need to state this plainly I think: I'm not against the use of lists for breadcrumbs, I think they're fine; I do however take issue with the notion that they are the only semantically valid approach. I too don't see any reason to change my views on this, which renders further discussion/debate kinda pointless. I respect your views on this issue Mordechai and you argue them well, and I apologise if I've antagonised you in any way, but at the end of the day it's better to 'agree to disagree' and move on to more fruitful discussions. -- Kevin Futter Webmaster, St. Bernard's College http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
