>> I may not be hip with the kind of basic design/marketing resources
you frequent. I'd be particularly mindful of "marketing" resources, as
they're clearly not an impartial or authoritive source of information on
what the web was meant to be and what HTML should be used for...
You weren't following my reasoning. I wasn't saying that the marketing
sites are a source for what HTML should be used for. I was claiming
that I think they describe the interaction between presentation and
content well - that there is a point where those layers cannot be
separated and the presentation becomes part of the content. This was in
context to how X/HTML is different from the written form of a speech, in
that hearing the presenter deliver the speech (i.e. the presentation)
feeds into the content.
I'm just not sure that the delivery of information is as cut and dry as
we're trying to make it...and if it's not that cut and dry, one has to
ask whether the model implemented in X/HTML is truly universal.
-Nate
*Nathan Rutman* ([EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Corporate Communications Designer
*Solvepoint Corporation*
882 South Matlack Street, Suite 110
West Chester, PA 19382
800.388.1850 x1208
484.356.0990 (fax)
www.solvepoint.com <http://www.solvepoint.com>
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
