On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 06:18 -0400, James Ellis wrote: > The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate > *descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user > can't access, rather than a "no flash" image.
Is there anything wrong with having an image as an intermediate fallback option (obviously with appropriate ALT text defined)? I'm no expert on using object tags, but I don't see anything wrong provided it's redundant at all levels... but am perfectly happy to be corrected if it's invalid or there are other reasons it's a bad practise... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency ________________________________________________________________________ E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the sender’s consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ________________________________________________________________________ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
