On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since the testimonial is basically a quote, why not use the <q> element? > Then use the presidents name within the <cite> element. This way it is > semantic, and you still get to style the presidents name any way that you > feel fit! > > Cheers > > Nathan
The example everyone is getting excited about isn't actually the right site... the first email Mario sent had an incorrect URL. The amended version (see subject: "[WSG] HomePage Review: Corrected URL") lists http://www.webnetdesignstudios.com/index1.htm as the correct address. A quick recap of (this aspect of) the thread follows. This page displays the testimonial in the form: <p><img src="Images/Icons/comment.gif" width="16" height="16" alt="Client Testimonial" /><strong>Joe Coyle,</strong> President</p> With the testimonial itself in the proceeding paragraph. I suggested that use of <strong> was inappropriate, as you don't really emphasis the name, it's purely for the visual differentiation of the name and title (so I understand it, anyway). <p class="testimonialname"><span>Joe Coyle,</span> President</p> and add the rule .testimonialname span {font-weight:bold} Would be, in my thinking, a more semantic alternative (that is, a semantically neutral alternative with no presentational markup). Argument about overkill and pedanticism followed. ;-) Josh Street base10solutions ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
