> From: T. R. Valentine > > On 04/10/05, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMO arial isn't so hot for the web anyway. > > So my questions are: what is wrong with Arial (Arial Unicode MS in > particular)? are there better font alternatives?
Typographers say it is "badly hinted". My take on that is that it has a poorer appearance than some other typefaces from which it was derived. I believe the differences are subtle and probably not visible in screen use. -- Peter Williams ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
